🔗 Share this article

The controversial, American and Israeli-supported Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) says it is winding down its relief activities in the affected area, following nearly half a year.

The foundation had previously halted its three food distribution sites in Gaza following the truce agreement between Hamas and Israel came into force in recent weeks.

The GHF aimed to bypass the UN as the primary provider of humanitarian assistance to Gazans.

UN and other aid agencies refused to co-operate with its approach, stating it was unethical and unsafe.

Hundreds of Palestinians were killed while seeking food amid disorderly situations near GHF's sites, mainly through Israeli military action, according to the UN.

Israeli authorities stated its forces fired cautionary rounds.

Mission Completion

The GHF said on the beginning of the week that it was concluding activities now because of the "satisfactory fulfillment of its emergency mission", with a total of three million packages containing the corresponding to over 187 million food portions provided to residents.

The GHF's executive director, Jon Acree, further mentioned the US-led Civil-Military Coordination Centre (CMCC) - which has been established to help implement US President Donald Trump's Gaza peace plan - would be "implementing and enlarging the model GHF piloted".

"The organization's system, in which militant groups were prevented from misappropriating relief supplies, had major impact in convincing militant groups to participate and achieving a ceasefire."

Feedback and Statements

Hamas - which denies stealing aid - approved the termination of the humanitarian foundation, according to reports.

A representative of declared the foundation should be held accountable for the harm it caused to local residents.

"We request all global human rights groups to guarantee that responsibility is assigned after resulting in fatalities and harm of many residents and covering up the starvation policy employed by the Israel's administration."

Foundation History

The organization commenced activities in Gaza on 26 May, a week after Israel had partially eased a complete restriction on relief and commercial goods to Gaza that lasted 11 weeks and led to substantial deficiencies of vital resources.

After 90 days, a famine was declared in the Gaza metropolitan area.

The foundation's nourishment distribution centers in southern and central Gaza were administered by American private security firms and situated within regions under Israeli military authority.

Humanitarian Concerns

The UN and its partners claimed the methodology breached the core assistance standards of objectivity, fairness and autonomy, and that directing needy individuals into armed forces regions was intrinsically hazardous.

The UN's human rights office said it recorded the deaths of a minimum of 859 residents attempting to obtain nourishment in the vicinity of GHF sites between 26 May and 31 July.

An additional 514 individuals were lost their lives close to the courses followed by international humanitarian deliveries, it also mentioned.

The majority of these individuals were fatally wounded by the Israeli military, based on the agency's reports.

Conflicting Accounts

Israeli defense forces claimed its forces had released alerting fire at persons who advanced toward them in a "menacing" manner.

The organization declared there were no shooting events at the relief locations and claimed the international organization of using "untrue and confusing" statistics from the Palestinian health authority administered by Hamas.

Future Implications

The organization's continuation had been unclear since militant groups and the Israeli government approved a halt in hostilities arrangement to implement the first phase of the United States' reconciliation proposal.

It said humanitarian assistance would take place "free from intervention from the both sides through the United Nations and its agencies, and the Red Crescent, in combination with other global organizations not linked whatsoever" with Hamas and Israel.

UN spokesperson Stephane Dujarric declared this week that the foundation's closure would have "zero effect" on its work "as we never partnered with them".

The official further mentioned that while increased relief was entering the region since the ceasefire took effect on early October, it was "insufficient to meet all the needs" of the 2.1 million residents.